Reuters Drug legalization could reduce government costs and raise tax revenues, but opponents worry over health and social ills State governments facing massive fiscal deficits might consider a rather unusual way to alleviate those debts — through the legalization of drugs like marijuana and thereby ending the costly drug war. In a study for the Cato Institute, Jeffrey A.
Now that many politicians and the public are taking a more objective look at marijuana, many are asking about the legal history of marijuana and how it ended up in the category of drugs deemed most dangerous by the federal government Schedule I.
At this time we saw an influx of immigration from Mexico into states like Texas and Louisiana.
Not surprising, these new Americans brought with them their native language, culture and customs. One of these customs was the use of cannabis as a medicine and relaxant.
The demonization of the cannabis plant was an extension of the demonization of the Mexican immigrants. The idea was to have an excuse to search, detain and deport Mexican immigrants.
That excuse became marijuana. This method of controlling people by controlling their customs was quite successful, so much so that it became a national strategy for keeping certain populations under the watch and control of the government.
This imagery became the backdrop for the Marijuana Tax Act of which effectively banned its use and sales. Cannabis was placed in the most restrictive category, Schedule I, supposedly as a place holder while then President Nixon commissioned a report to give a final recommendation.
The Schafer Commission, as it was called, declared that marijuana should not be in Schedule I and even doubted its designation as an illicit substance. However, Nixon discounted the recommendations of the commission, and marijuana remains a Schedule I substance.
InCalifornia became the first state to approve the use of marijuana for medical purposes, ending its 59 year reign as an illicit substance with no medical value. In this context, its blip as an illicit and dangerous drug was dwarfed by its role as a medicine.
Opponents of medical marijuana regulations claim that there is not enough research to warrant medicinal use, but supporters of medical marijuana point to the years of history where cannabis was widely used as evidence for its medical efficacy.
Now that 23 states, plus Washington, DC, have passed medical marijuana laws, the public is questioning the utility of keeping marijuana under lock and key, especially in light of the racist and propagandized basis for making it illegal in the first place.
In just a few weeks, Florida, Oregon, Alaska and Washington DC voters will have the opportunity to put an additional nail in the coffin of prohibition by voting to legalize medical access in Florida and adult access in Oregon, Alaska and Washington DC.
Changing the marijuana laws in these states and more to come is one of the first steps in dismantling the racially motivated war on drugs. Sincerely, The Doctors Dr. Malik Burnett is a former surgeon and physician advocate. He also served as executive director of a medical marijuana nonprofit organization.
View more Ask the Expert blog posts. Site Provides No Medical Advice This site is not designed to and does not provide medical advice, professional diagnosis, opinion, treatment or services to you or to any other individual.
Through this site and linkages to other sites, the Drug Policy Alliance provides general information for educational purposes only. The information provided in this site, or through linkages to other sites, is not medical advice and is not a substitute for medical or professional care.
The Drug Policy Alliance is not liable or responsible for any advice or information you obtain through this site.- Ever since marijuana’s introduction to the United States of America in , controversy of the use and legalization of the claimed-to-be Schedule I drug spread around the nation.
That's understandable: Different drugs do carry different risks, and the potential for serious harm from marijuana is less than for cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine.
What happened in states after medical marijuana laws were passed? Did opioid overdoses go up, stay the same, or go down? Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr.
Greger may be referring, watch the above video. In.
Here Are The 10 Stocks To Play California's Huge Marijuana Legalization Vote. Today, in states with the most liberal marijuana laws, citizens’ access to the drug now resembles that of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, before the first attempts at federal regulation.
A component of the Executive Office of the President, ONDCP was created by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of The ONDCP Director is the principal advisor to the President on drug control issues.